Wednesday, 20 January 2010

  • Currently
    The Pilgrim's Progress (Penguin Classics)
    By John Bunyan
    see related

    Blame It On Coakley At Your Own Risk

    I'm betting a lot of Democrats woke up this morning thinking, "Did is really happen?  Did we lose actually Teddy's seat to a Republican?"  Who can blame them?  For a year, the accomplice media has been supporting and underscoring everything the Democrat leadership and the administration have said and done, all despite steadily declining poll numbers showing that the American people were increasingly disturbed by the direction they were going.  Obama, Pelosi and Reid have become a living triumvirate tribute to the time-honored political profession of being utterly tone-deaf to the well-voiced concerns of the populace, focusing all of their energies on passing a health care takeover that only one third of the people support while largely ignoring national 10% unemployment and 17% U6 underemployment figures (with the mind-numbing exception of throwing hundreds of billions of dollars from a not-too-likely future where it would actually exist into a hideously stupid Keynesian experiment that has failed like almost nothing else modern US government has ever tried). 
     
    They've lost two Democrat governorships and now the previously engraved-in-stone Democrat Senate seat held since shortly after the dawn of time by Ted Kennedy.  Obama personally made appearances for all three, and had no discernible effect.  Again, how can you blame them for calling him in; to watch the news you would have no idea that the president's approval ratings are in the tank, you'd think that all of the people except the radical right-wingers worship him and that his attempts thus far at "fundamentally remaking America" have been exactly what the people wanted.  If you are able watch Keith Olbermann for more than a minute without reflexively changing the channel or throwing the remote into the set, you probably think that the very fact that Obama did a photo-op with someone should improve their poll numbers by ten percentage points.
     
    The circular firing squad in Democrat punditry today has made clear what many in the center and on the right have suspected for quite some time:  the far left either does not want to see or is incapable of seeing that America is not and never had been interested in the kind of change they're trying to force into place.  America has been greatly dumbed-down by the liberal-run public education system over the past sixty-plus years, but somehow there are still enough functioning synapses available out there to sputteringly spark the conclusion that when you're hopelessly over your head in debt is probably a bad time to spend trillions of dollars and take out an adjustable rate mortgage on the future that our grandchildren have no hope of paying.
     
    On a day like today, where a majority of the nation is clearly breathing a sigh of relief and expressing dim hope for the first time in months, one would expect the Democrats to be taking stock and assessing their plans, looking for ways to gracefully back off and align themselves more with the independent voters who just took them to the woodshed in Massachusetts and will likely do the same nationally in November.  Not so much, though, at least not that you can tell.  They're blaming Coakley for being a lame candidate.  I grew up in Massachusetts, and I can tell you this:  if the people of the state were even close to satisfied with the status quo, you could have put a "D" on a head of cabbage and run it against Scott Brown and it would have won by four percentage points.  This race had nothing to do with Coakley, and not even so much to do with Brown, although his ability to speak to the concerns of the people definitely helped.  They're blaming Republicans for "misinformation" and "fear-mongering" over the health care takeover bill.  Note to those:  If you had shone some light on this thing as you'd promised, and had shown us exactly how wonderful this thing was, the misinformation and fear-mongering would have fallen flat, no?  Unless, of course, it's not misinformation and "fear-mongering" is just a Democrat euphemism for "telling the truth about what we're trying to hide till it's passed."
     
    So what's the problem?  There are two problems: 
    1.  the majority of the media is so far left that they can't see the center anymore,
    2.  the Democrat leadership is as well, and so they take what the media says as affirmation that the populace agrees and is buying what they are selling.
     
    Of course, there are other problems.  Too many of the high-ranking Democrats apparently have never actually met a payroll, ran anything that had to make a profit, or actually had to defend their views in a true marketplace of ideas.  Too many of them haven't had to worry about a household budget in way too long or a job where poor performance can get them fired.  Too many of them apparently have no idea what it means to wear a uniform, or what it actually means when you swear to defend the Constitution against enemies foreign and domestic, this latter being evidenced by how so many of their major initiatives are absolutely not authorized under the Constitution.  And between the Democrats and their fawning media, somewhere between November and January, an electoral win against lousy opponents became a mandate to undo the America we've known and replace it with a semi-socialist "Euromerica".
     
    Democrats:  This is free from me to you, and it's because I don't want to see a Republican super-majority any more than I wanted to see the Democrat super-majority.  Our government was designed for gridlock; it was designed by the founders so that no one party should normally have all the power and make policy that a majority of the people don't want.  Republicans have proven that as a majority, they tend to forget their principles and act a lot like, well, you.  So I would rather have the two of you about evenly balanced, so that nothing is going go through that isn't something that most of the country wants.  Anyway, here it is.  Slow down.  Back off.  Pay attention to the polls on the issues.  Listen to the people in the town hall meetings.  Trade your agenda for a sincere desire to do the will of your constituents rather then bending the constituents to your will.  Fix the problems in health insurance rather than turning it into another hideously inefficient and unfundable bureaucracy.  Get off your abortion high horse and admit that most of the country thinks it is unacceptable, allow states to handle it and get the fed out of it.
     
    Yes, you will lose a portion of your base.  The far left will howl.  But there is a wide swath in the middle that keeps swaying from side to side.  These are us, the independents.  You can have our votes.  It's not impossible.  And you can keep from being decimated in November.  I don't think you can let go of your agenda and do the will of the people.  I don't think you have the guts or the honor to do it.

Friday, 15 January 2010

  • Currently
    Shout to the Lord: Special Gold Edition
    By Hillsong
    see related

    World's Shortest Books Part Deux

    Sometime ago someone sent me a list of "the world's shortest books", which contained titles by unlikely authors.  It took me awhile, but I couldn't let it go, so here's my contribution to the cause:

    Enjoying The Fruits Of Your Labors -- Barack Obama
    Protecting Freedom For All -- The American Civil Liberties Union
    Successful Implementation Of Progressive Economic Theory - Barney Frank and Chris Dodd
    Speaking the Truth With Clarity and Dignity - Nancy Pelosi
    Playing Fair - Andrew Stern, President of SEIU
    The Science Behind How Global Warming Causes Global Cooling - Al Gore, UN IPCC
    How the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 Saved America - Jimmy Carter
    Saving Your Marriage - Hillary Rodham (Clinton)
    Ethics and Democracy - Alton Bennett, President of Acorn Housing
    How To Convince People That You Know What You're Talking About - Keith Olbermann
    Secrecy Requirements And National Security
    - Compilation by Various Democrat Congressmen
    Saying The Right Thing At The Right Time - Pat Robertson
    Saying The Right Thing At The Right Time Group Study Workbook - Van Jones
    Saying The Right Thing At The Right Time Audiobook - Al Sharpton (megaphone), Intro by Jesse Jackson
    Primer on Race Relations for the 21st Century - Harry Reid, Robert Byrd, William J. Clinton
    Holding Back - Ann Coulter
    Treatise On String Theory - Joe Biden
    Reaping The Benefits Of Keynesian Economics - Barack Obama, Ben Bernanke, Henry Paulsen
    Building A Peaceful Nuclear Power Program - Mahmoud Ahmedinejad
    The Benefits of Reaching Across The Aisle - George W. Bush
    Recalling The Freedoms Of Home - anonymous, Guantanamo Bay
    Being A Sympathetic Figure - Rush Limbaugh
    Why A Candidate Should Always Listen to Campaign Handlers - Sarah Palin
    Turning Things Around Without Making Any Changes - Arnold Schwarzenegger
    The Threat Radical Islam Poses to America - Janet Napolitano
    Standing Firm - Compilation by Various Republican Leaders

    What have you got?

Wednesday, 13 January 2010

  • Currently
    Praying: Finding Our Way Through Duty to Delight
    By J. I. Packer, Carolyn Nystrom
    see related

    Creed

    Heard this while listening to Ravi Zacharias yesterday, thought it was worth sharing...

    Creed
    by Steve Turner


    We believe in Marxfreudanddarwin
    We believe everything is OK as long as you don't hurt anyone to the best of your definition of hurt, and to the best of your knowledge.

    We believe in sex before, during, and after marriage.
    We believe in the therapy of sin.
    We believe that adultery is fun.
    We believe that sodomy’s OK.
    We believe that taboos are taboo.

    We believe that everything's getting better despite evidence to the contrary.
    The evidence must be investigated
    And you can prove anything with evidence.

    We believe there's something in horoscopes, UFO's and bent spoons.

    Jesus was a good man just like Buddha, Mohammed, and ourselves.
    He was a good moral teacher though we think His good morals were bad.

    We believe that all religions are basically the same- at least the one that we read was.
    They all believe in love and goodness.
    They only differ on matters of creation, sin, heaven, hell, God, and salvation.

    We believe that after death comes the Nothing
    Because when you ask the dead what happens they say nothing.

    If death is not the end, if the dead have lied, then its compulsory heaven for all
    excepting perhaps Hitler, Stalin, and Genghis Kahn

    We believe in Masters and Johnson
    What's selected is average.
    What's average is normal.
    What's normal is good.

    We believe in total disarmament.
    We believe there are direct links between warfare and bloodshed.

    Americans should beat their guns into tractors .
    And the Russians would be sure to follow.

    We believe that man is essentially good.
    It's only his behavior that lets him down.
    This is the fault of society.
    Society is the fault of conditions.
    Conditions are the fault of society.

    We believe that each man must find the truth that is right for him.
    Reality will adapt accordingly.
    The universe will readjust.
    History will alter.

    We believe that there is no absolute truth excepting the truth that there is no absolute truth.

    We believe in the rejection of creeds,
    And the flowering of individual thought.

    If Chance be the Father of all flesh,
    disaster is his rainbow in the sky
    and when you hear

    State of Emergency!
    Sniper Kills Ten!
    Troops on Rampage!
    Whites go Looting!
    Bomb Blasts School!

    It is but the sound of man worshiping his maker.

Tuesday, 30 June 2009

  • Currently
    The Pursuit Of God
    By A. W. Tozer
    see related

    Both hands and a flashlight

    You are being lied to again.  You know it, but you're going to ignore it and hope for the best again.  I have news for you, the best is not what's coming.  America's misplaced faith in its government is becoming reminiscent of the battered spouse who keeps coming back thinking this time it will be different.  It actually is going to be different this time.  It's going to be worse.

    The House passed the Cap and Trade (more like cap and traitor) bill this week.  If it passes the Senate, El Presidente will sign it into law.  Yay for the environment.  I mean, now the polar bears aren't going to drown and it'll never get warm here in Wisconsin in the summer again I guess, right?  Wrong.

    Let's bypass popular science real quick here (because it's bought and paid for by special interests) and talk about simple reality.  Climate change is the normal state of affairs on the planet Earth, has been since it started spinning, will be till it stops.  Get used to it.  Ice melts, then it gets thicker.  Storms are strong some years and weaker others.  Average temperatures rise and fall.  And it's all been going on since the human race's only contributions to the atmosphere were exhalation, flatulence and cooking fires.  And get this, you're never going to believe it, but it's caused by fluctuations in the output of that 25 million degree fireball that lights up the sky every day.  Pop quiz:  why is Greenland called Greenland if it's covered with ice?  I wasn't positive I was right on this one so I looked it up.  Here's what I found:  "Greenland was warmer in the tenth century than it is now."  Holy hydrocarbons Batman, you mean Eric the Red and his shaggy posse all drove Hummer H2s???  So wait, the Northern Hemisphere was warm enough in the tenth century that Greenland could support crops and the polar bears didn't drown but it's covered with ice now and they're in mortal danger of it?  Why, either I'm just plain stupid or that doesn't make a lick of sense to anyone but Al Gore, Nancy Pelosi the San Francisco Treat (sorry, I couldn't resist) and the Sierra Club (my mountain bike has a carbon-sequestering kickstand)!  Come on!  Let's start using the brains God gave us!

    None of this has anything whatsoever to do with the environment.  If it did, would we really be hobbling American industry and driving the few remaining manufacturing jobs overseas where the same work is likely to cause much more pollution because the countries getting the jobs simply pay lip-service to what we're going to kill ourselves over?  Cap and Trade isn't going to reduce pollution, it's going to increase pollution.  Further, the two major economic net effects of it are going to be income and revenue that would have come to the US will to go other countries, and more of the income earned by US citizens will go to the government.  Everything that requires energy will be affected, and the poor are going to get the worst of it.  Check out this testimony before the Senate Republican Conference by Ben Lieberman, Senior Policy Analyst for Energy and Environment in the Thomas A. Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies at The Heritage Foundation.  Here are some highlights:

    It is clear that cap-and-trade is very expensive and amounts to nothing more than an energy tax in disguise. After all, when you sweep aside all the complexities of how cap and trade operates--and make no mistake, this is the most convoluted attempt at economic central planning this nation has ever attempted--the bottom line is that cap and trade works by raising the cost of energy high enough so that individuals and businesses are forced to use less of it. Inflicting economic pain is what this is all about. That is how the ever-tightening emissions targets will be met.
    [cut]
    Overall, Waxman-Markey reduces gross domestic product by an average of $393 billion annually between 2012 and 2035, and cumulatively by $9.4 trillion. In other words, the nation will be $9.4 trillion poorer with Waxman-Markey than without it.

    (Hosea 4:6 KJVR)  My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children.

    Our problem isn't one of left and right, Democrat and Republican.  Our problem is one of right and wrong, God and godlessness.  Our society has decided to worship the creation rather than the Creator and is apparently willing to sacrifice the remains of our economy on the altar of doe-eyed environmentalism.  Our government, which obviously cares for nothing other than expanding itself and re-election, sees an opening; the blood of ignorance is in the water.  After decades of intentional dumbing-down in the public schools, the American people are sufficiently ripe for the plucking; most of us are too under-educated and entitlement-minded now to even understand what's going on.  Nationalization of banks and auto makers, government-run health care, cap and trade, the mass appointment of "Czars" by the president (a method of pulling control from the legislative branch to the executive branch and tipping the balance of power in favor of the executive),  a Supreme Court nominee whose shining stars are her ethnicity and that she's smarter than a white man, the list goes on and on. The national media with few notable exceptions literally worships the most leftist President since Carter (whoo, wasn't the Carter presidency fun?) and people laugh it off or claim it's not happening.  

    Ten years ago, if someone had said the American people would elect a completely inexperienced man whose leanings and associations are unapologetically Marxist to president of the United States after he made as a part of his platform his desire to "remake America" by "redistributing the wealth", few would have believed it.  The farther America drifts from God, the more ridiculous things are going to become.  Trust me, this is just the beginning.  

Monday, 23 March 2009

Tuesday, 03 March 2009

  • Currently
    The Pursuit of God
    By A. W. Tozer
    see related

    Administration Vetting Invocations?

    Today I nearly amazed myself by agreeing for the first time ever with "Reverend" Barry Lynn of Americans United for Separation of Church and State on the administration's new policy (and and now I know how The Eagles feel):

    But many church/state experts are unfamiliar with the program. "The only thing worse than having these prayers in the first place is to have them vetted, because it entangles the White House in core theological matters," Barry W. Lynn, executive director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, said upon learning of the Obama invocations.

    If you're not familiar with Lynn, whenever the cable news outlets decide that religion is getting a little uncomfortable for their tastes, they trot him out because he calls himself a reverend and yet speaks like an ACLU atheist where it comes to matters of the public practice of faith in the US.  They love using him to show us that "see, even one of your own says you're wrong".  Of course, the only reason he gets any facetime at all is that he is to them, in the term of endearment so often (and probably wrongly) attributed to Vladimir Lenin, a "useful idiot".  Lynn evidences an utter and apparently intentional lack of understanding of the intent of the "wall of separation" that secularists like to use to "prove" their purposeful misinterpretation of the "separation of church and state".

    And yet, Lynn finally gets one right here. 
    What on earth is the White House doing vetting and editing prayers?  Well, since no one else will say it, I will.  They're correctly interpreting the first amendment, for one thing, and it's one thing you only see from the left when it benefits them.  The first amendment reads: 

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

    Congress.  Not the president.  Not the states.  Not local government.  Just Congress.  And whatever powers are not explicitly granted to the federal government in the Constitution are supposed to be left to the states.  That means that if the state of Rhode Island decided to establish Roman Catholicism as the state religion (which I believe would be legal as long as no one was compelled to join or support it by the government according to article iii of the state Constitution), it would be perfectly allowable under our federal Constitution.  It also means that nothing other than some other law prevents the president from filtering Jesus Christ out of invocational prayer and adding more invocational prayer to seem religious, or from insisting on prayers to a block of Spam for that matter, again as long as they didn't intimate that worshiping Spam was the preferred state religion.  It even means that if the folks at City Hall decide to have a Nativity display on public property paid for with private donations here in Wisconsin, they are within their rights as far as the first amendment is concerned. [King v. Village of Waunakee, 185 Wis. 2d 25, 517 N.W.2d 671 (1994)
    (Wisconsin state constitution, Article 1, section 18)]

    The reason I assume that there is no other viable federal law in this area is that none is ever quoted other than a glancing reference to the first amendment (without ever actually reciting the text lest people think it through) or the trumpeting of the term "separation of church and state" because it is assumed that everyone will think it means what they have been fooled into thinking it means.  The understanding of the first amendment has been so successfully twisted in the minds of a dumbed-down America that most people believe it means that religion must be extracted from government.  Few seem to realize that the point was to keep government from enforcing religion. 

    The real question here is:  what is the purpose of adding more invocational prayer, but removing reference to anything but a comfortably generic god of one's own imagining?  Or perhaps, could this be an attempt to use "tolerance/acceptance" to continue to water down the public understanding of God, and undermine the influence of the believing church by adding more "prayer" and making God seem like one of many gods?


    2 Timothy 3:1-5 ESV But understand this, that in the last days there will come times of difficulty. (2) For people will be lovers of self, lovers of money, proud, arrogant, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, (3) heartless, unappeasable, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not loving good, (4) treacherous, reckless, swollen with conceit, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, (5) having the appearance of godliness, but denying its power. Avoid such people.

Thursday, 29 January 2009

  • song of faith

    My 5 year old daughter was caught singing this the other day when she thought no one was listening.  In this time of uncertainty, the faith of a child can really speak. 
     
    Jesus is the one we should love because he is the one who saved us from our sins...
    He is the only one that I have and need and really like.

Friday, 19 December 2008

  • Currently
    Influenced
    see related

    "season's greetings"

    To my Democrat friends

    Please accept with no obligation, implied or implicit, my best wishes for an environmentally conscious, socially responsible, low-stress, non-addictive, gender-neutral celebration of the winter solstice holiday, practiced within the most enjoyable traditions of the religious persuasion of your choice, or secular practices of your choice, with respect for the religious/secular persuasion and/or traditions of others, or their choice not to practice religious or secular traditions at all.

    I also wish you a fiscally successful, personally fulfilling and medically uncomplicated recognition of the onset of the generally accepted calendar year 2009, but not without due respect for the calendars of choice of other cultures whose contributions to society have helped make America great. Not to imply that America is necessarily greater than any other country nor the only America in the Western Hemisphere. Also, this wish is made without regard to the race, creed, color, age, physical ability, religious faith or sexual preference of the wishee.

    To my Republican friends:

    Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!

     

Friday, 07 November 2008

  • Currently Reading
    The Gospel According to Jesus: What Is Authentic Faith?
    By John MacArthur
    see related

    Too Easily Turned Aside

    As a Christian, I am conflicted in my reaction to the election results this past Tuesday.  I would be saddened by the election of such a staunch supporter of abortion even if the make-up of Congress was such that he would get little done and could have little effect on the Supreme Court.  But that's not the case.  Congress drifted farther to the left as well, and there's precious little standing between anything the left decides to do by way of killing the remains of the American work ethic by subsidizing mediocrity. 
     
    Jesus told us not to worry.  Unfortunately, like with so many of the other things He told us to do or not to do, perfection is a goal never attained.  I admit to worry.  I'm worried that my kids will be dragged off to the public schools to be indoctrinated in secular paganism and taught that ours is a narrow, unacceptable Way.  I'm worried that any progress made toward limiting abortion-on-demand even up to the day of birth will be lost.  And I'm saddened that the nation that could have been apparently is not going to be.  All it will take is for a few Supreme Court justices to retire and be replaced with "progressive" appointees (as opposed to constructionalist) to tip the scales and the course of America takes a hard left into Europe Part Deux.  Yes, it is possible even now for the LORD to call a revival.  And yet, it's hard from here to see that happening.  We're following Europe down the path they blazed, and that path leads directly away from GOD.
     
    I know that nothing can be changed for the better through legislation; I understand completely that true change happens in the heart.  And I know that if we are to retake this country and put it back on its original foundation, it's going to be through massive and effective evangelism, and not the kind that's currently passing for the real thing.  And that's going to be really hard to do if the ACLU gets their way and manage to make the scripture "hate speech" as their counterparts in Canada have already done. 
     
    The odds are against us like never before in the United States.  Perhaps they need to be.  Perhaps we'll never do what GOD wants us to do until they are.  GOD had to bring persecution against the fledgling church to get them to leave Jerusalem and spread the word.  And don't get me wrong, I'm not complaining or saying that we have it bad while I know that others are dying for their faith in foreign lands, not at all!  It is more a matter of mourning what could have been.  Of course, GOD's plan is the right plan, I'd just hoped that America would be a more positive part of it.  At least for now, that doesn't appear to be in the plan.
     
    This past Sunday the missionary who spoke to our congregation told us that in non-western nations the gospel is being accepted at a fantastic rate, and that people especially in Africa are taking the scripture seriously and at face value.  That really spoke to me.  My take on scripture is if it says something, that's what it means.  Yet here in America we have uncountable differences on what scripture means, what it says vs. what it "really" means, whether it's infallible or suggestive, the word of GOD or not so much.  We get college degree after college degree and then write books on why the other guys are wrong. 
     
    And yet, Christ said we would have to have the faith of a child to enter the kingdom of God.  I watch my children closely with how they interact with scripture.  The thing that always stands out is this:  if the Bible says it, they believe is, and they believe it exactly as the Bible says it.  No allegorization, no explaining away the hard stuff, no reaching out to literary styles to unwrap archetypes and symbols.  The faith of the child says, "God said go, here I go". 
     
    Recently my older daughter (8) had a depressing time with the kids in the neighborhood because they were apparently getting tired of her talking about Jesus and told her she'd have more friends if she talked about fun things like Six Flags (which was cruel because they knew she hadn't been there yet).  This was the first time that we really understood what was going on out there.  She was taking her bible and talking to these kids about Jesus, not because we'd told her to because we hadn't, she was doing it because JESUS TOLD HER TO in His word.  Because she knows they're headed for hell without Jesus.  I'd say GOD bless her, but I'm too late! 
     
    It's time for us to take a page from the Africans, and from my daughter.  The faith of a child.  Obedience to a direct command.  Simple understanding.  Humility.  Go, preach the gospel, make disciples and teach them.  It's not your gift?  It's not mine either.  But we have a choice.  If we're going to do anything about the situation our country is in, it's going to take the faith of a child, plain old-fashioned obedience, and a little getting over ourselves.  If we're going to change this country at all, we're going to have to do it from the bottom up, because it's not going to happen from the top (government) down. 
     
    We've been focused on the wrong campaign.
     

Monday, 20 October 2008

  • Currently Reading
    Who Stole My Church?: What to Do When the Church You Love Tries to Enter the 21st Century
    By Gordon MacDonald
    see related

    Focus

    As a group, we conservative Christians have a tendency to overreact to the small things and sometimes (sadly) underreact to the big things.  A recent example of overreaction that became obvious very quickly was the release of the DaVinci Code movie.  If only we'd just been quiet and not gotten so upset (like I did), maybe it would have made even less money and been less inspiring to people who want to attack biblical Christianity.  It was more or less panned by the critics as being hard to follow and having paper-thin character development.  It hardly ended up deserving the uprising we gave it.  Every pastor with a TV, radio or podcast ministry put out a sermon or series about it, but in the end it was quickly forgotten, and deservedly so.

    In a way, this reminds me of hazing when I pledged a college fraternity so many years ago.  At certain points in the process one might be blindfolded and subjected to all sorts of noise that seems dangerous and is distracting, but if you're able to focus on what you're supposed to be doing, the noise has no real effect.  And when it's over, the stress of the din is forgotten.  Likewise for us, it would appear that much of the enemy's plan probably consists of distracting us with noise to keep us from focusing on the task at hand, which is spreading the gospel.

    The latest entry in the noise category is a pseudo-documentary by one-time comic/self-appointed social commentator Bill Maher called "Religulous".  The concept is basically to show how stupid religious people are.  Unfortunately, he's more right than he is wrong.  I won't even bother to address other religions, I don't have to.  Combine some of the things people who profess Christianity do and say with the fact that almost anything about Christianity looks alien to the Hollywood crowd at this point, and guys like Maher have all the material they could dream about to make a "documentary" of this sort showing what idiots we are.  And to no small degree, we have it coming.  Just within so-called evangelical Christianity the deviations from sound doctrine are puzzling, nonsensical and generally self-serving.  And I would imagine, people being what we are, that evangelical Christianity is not alone in that problem.

    Which kind of leads me back to my point of remaining focused spreading the gospel.  Not the social gospel, not the PEACE plan, not the prosperity gospel, not blab-it-and-grab-it...  not anything but the gospel of Jesus Christ and Him crucified.  The enemy surrounds us with noise and we are too easily turned aside.  Maher's movie will amount to nothing just as the DaVinci Code did and how ever many books and movies before it.  The attacks never end, but God is not mocked...

    The Anvil Of God’s Word

    Last eve I passed beside a blacksmith’s door
    And heard the anvil ring the vesper chime;
    When looking in, I saw upon the floor,
    Old hammers worn with beating years of time.

    “How many anvils have you had,” said I,
    “To wear and batter these hammers so?”
    “Just one,” said he; then with a twinkling eye,
    “The anvil wears the hammers out, you know.”

    And so, I thought, the anvil of God’s Word,
    For ages, skeptics blows have beat upon;
    Yet, though the noise of falling blows was heard,
    The anvil is unharmed - the hammers gone.

    John Clifford

Top Tags

[no tags]
    • Name: John
    • Birthday: 2/12/1965
    • Gender: Male
    • Member Since: 11/26/2007

Archives

Don't worry - your calendar is here… to see it in action just click "Save" above and refresh the page.

About Me

  • Christian husband and dad working my way through God's adult education program.

Groups

[no groups]